34991
U

Property:Has Hadith Text

From HodHood
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a property of type Text.

Pages using the property "Has Hadith Text"

Showing 25 pages using this property.

View (previous 25 | next 25) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

M
MuwataMalik-017-001-34836 +Malik related to me from Abdullah Ibn Abi Bakr Ibn Muhammad Ibn Amr Ibn Hazm from Abd AlMalik Ibn Abi Bakr Ibn Abdulrahman Ibn AlHarith Ibn Hisham that his father told him that AlAsi Ibn Hisham had died and left three sons; two by one wife and one by another wife. One of the two with the same mother died and left property and mawali. His full brother inherited his property and the wala of his mawali. Then he also died; and left as heirs his son and his paternal half brother. His son said; I obtain what my father inherited of property and the wala of the mawali. His brother said; It is not like that. You obtain the property. As for the wala of the mawali; it is not so. Do you think that had it been my first brother who died today; I would not have inherited from him? They argued and went to Uthman Ibn Affan. He gave a judgement that the brother had the wala of the mawali.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34837 +Malik related to me from Abdullah Ibn Abi Bakr Ibn Hazm that his father told him that he was sitting with Aban Ibn Uthman; and an argument was brought to him between some people from the Juhayna tribe and some people from the Banu AlHarith Ibn AlKhazraj. A woman of the Juhayna tribe was married to a man from the Banu AlHarith Ibn AlKhazraj; called Ibrahim Ibn Kulayb. She died and left property and mawali; and her son and husband inherited them from her. Then her son died and his heirs said; We have the wala of the mawali. Her son obtained them. Those of the Juhayna said; It is not like that. They are the mawali of our female associate. When her child died; we have their wala and we inherit them. Aban Ibn Uthman gave a judgement that the people from the Juhayna tribe did indeed have the wala of the mawali.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34838 +Malik related to me that he had heard that Said Ibn AlMusayab spoke about a man who died and left three sons and left mawali whom he had freed. Then two of his sons died and left children. He said; The third remaining son inherits the mawali. When he dies; his children and the children of his brothers share equally in the wala of the mawali.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34839 +Malik related to me that he had asked Ibn Shihab about a slave who was released. He said; He gives his wala to whomever he likes. If he dies and has not given his wala to anyone; his inheritance goes to the muslims and his blood-money is paid by them. Malik said; The best of what has been heard about a slave who is released is that no one gets his wala; and his inheritance goes to the muslims; and they pay his blood-money. Malik said that when the slave of a jew or christian became muslim and he was freed before being sold; the wala of the freed slave went to the muslims. If the jew or christian became muslim afterwards; the wala did not revert to him. He said; However; if a jew or christian frees a slave from their own deen; and then the freed one becomes muslim before the jew or christian who freed him becomes muslim and then the one who freed him has become muslim; his wala reverts to him because the wala was confirmed for him on the day he freed him. Malik said that the muslim child of a jew or christian inherited the mawali of his jewish or christian father when the freed mawla became muslim before the one who freed him became muslim. If the freed one was already muslim when he was freed; the muslim children of the christian or jew had nothing of the wala of a muslim slave because the jew and the christian did not have the wala. The wala of a muslim slave went to the community of muslims.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34840 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Abdullah Ibn Abi Bakr Ibn Muhammad Ibn Amr Ibn Hazm from his father that in a letter which the Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; sent to Amr Ibn Hazm about blood-money he wrote that it was one hundred camels for a life; one hundred camels for a nose if completely removed; a third of the blood-money for a wound in the brain; the same as that for a belly wound; fifty for an eye; fifty for a hand; fifty for a foot; ten camels for each finger; and five for teeth; and five for a head wound which laid bare the bone.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34841 +Malik related to me that he had heard that Umar Ibn AlKhattab estimated the full blood-money for the people of urban areas. For those who had gold; he made it one thousand dinars. and for those who had silver he made it ten thousand dirhams. Malik said; The people of gold are the people of AlSham and the people of Egypt. The people of silver are the people of Iraq Yahya related to me from Malik that he heard that the blood-money was divided into instalments over three or four years. Malik said; Three is the most preferable to me of what I have heard on that. Malik said; The generally agreed on way of doing things in our community is that camels are not accepted from the people of cities for blood-money nor is gold or silver accepted from the desert people. Silver is not accepted from the people of gold and gold is not accepted from the people of silver.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34842 +Yahya related to me from Malik that Ibn Shihab said; The full blood-money for murder when it is accepted is twenty-five yearlings; twenty-five two-year-olds; twenty-five four-year-olds; and twenty-five five-year-olds.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34843 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya Ibn Said that Marwan Ibn AlHakam wrote to Muawiya Ibn Abi Sufyan that a madman was brought to him who had killed a man. Muawiya wrote to him; Tie him up and do not inflict any retaliation on him. There is no retaliation against a madman. Malik said about an adult and a child when they murder a man together; The adult is killed and the child pays half the full blood-money. Malik said; It is like that with a freeman and a slave when they murder a slave. The slave is killed and the freeman pays half of his value.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34844 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Irak Ibn Malik and Sulayman Ibn Yasar that a man of the Banu Sad Ibn Layth was running a horse and it trod on the finger of a man from the Juhayna tribe. It bled profusely; and he died. Umar Ibn AlKhattab said to those against whom the claim was made. Do you swear by Allah with fifty oaths that he did not die of it? They refused and stopped themselves from doing it. He said to the others; Will you take an oath? They refused; so Umar Ibn AlKhattab gave a judgement that the Banu Sad had to pay half the full blood-money. Malik said; One does not act on this.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34845 +Yahya related to me from Malik that Ibn Shihab; Sulayman Ibn Yasar; and Rabia Ibn Abi Abdulrahman said; The blood-money of manslaughter is twenty yearlings; twenty two-year-olds; twenty male two-year-olds; twenty four-year-olds; and twenty five-year-olds. Malik said; The generally agreed on way with us is that there is no retaliation against children. Their intention is accidental. The hudud are not obliged for them if they have not yet reached puberty. If a child kills someone it is only accidentally. Had a child and an adult killed a free man accidentally; each of them pays half the full blood-money. Malik said; A person who kills someone accidentally pays blood-money with his property and there is no retaliation against him. That money is like anything else from the dead man property and his debt is paid with it and he is allowed to make a bequest from it. If he has a total property of which the blood-money is a third and then the blood-money is relinquished; that is permitted to him. If all the property he has is his blood-money; he is permitted to relinquish a third of it and to make that a bequest.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34846 +Malik related to me that the generally agreed on way of doing things amongst the community about an accident is that there is no blood-money until the victim is better. If a man bone; either a hand; or a foot; or another part of his body; is broken accidentally and it heals and becomes sound and returns to its form; there is no blood-money for it. If the limb is impaired or there is a scar on it; there is blood-money for it according to the extent that it is impaired. Malik said; If that part of the body has a specific blood-money mentioned by the Prophet; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; it is according to what the Prophet; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; specified. If it is part of what does not have a specific blood-money for it mentioned by the Prophet; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; and if there is no previous sunna about it or specific blood-money; one uses ijtihad about it. Malik said; There is no blood-money for an accidental bodily injury when the wound heals and returns to its form. If there is any scar or mark in that; ijtihad is used about it except for the belly-wound. There is a third of the blood-money of a life for it. Malik said; There is no blood-money for the wound which splinters a bone in the body; and it is like the wound to the body which lays bare the bone. Malik said; The generally agreed on way of doing things in our community is that when the doctor performs a circumcision and cuts off the glans; he must pay the full blood-money. That is because it is an accident which the tribe is responsible for; and the full blood money is payable for all that in which a doctor errs or exceeds; when it is not intentional.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34847 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya Ibn Said that Said Ibn AlMusayab said; The blood-money for a woman is the same as for a man up to one third of the blood-money. Her finger is like his finger; her tooth is like his tooth; her injury which lays bare the bone is like his; and her head wound which splinters the bone is like his.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34848 +Yahya related to me from Malik that Ibn Shihab and also Urwa Ibn AlZubair said the same as Said Ibn AlMusayab said about a woman. Her blood-money from a man is the same up to a third of the blood-money of a man. If what she is owed exceeds a third of the blood-money of the man; she is given up to half of the blood-money of a man. Malik said; The explanation of that is that she has blood-money for a head wound that lays bare the bone and one that splinters the bone and for what is less than the brain wound and the belly wound and the like of that of those which obliges a third of the blood-money or more. If the amount owed her exceeds that; her blood- money in that is half of the blood-money of a man.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34849 +Yahya related to me from Malik that he heard Ibn Shihab say; The precedent of the sunna when a man injures a woman is that he must pay the blood- money for that injury and there is no retaliation against him. Malik said; That is an accidental injury; when a man strikes a woman and hits with a blow what he did not intend; for instance; if he struck her with a whip and cut her eye open and the like of that. Malik said about a woman who has a husband and children who are not from her paternal relatives or her people; that since he is from another tribe; there is no blood-money against her husband for her criminal action; nor any against her children if they are not from her people; nor any against her maternal brothers when they are not from her paternal relations or her people. These are entitled to her inheritance but only the paternal relations have paid blood-money from since the time of the Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace. Until today it is like that with the mawla of a woman. The inheritance they leave goes to the children of the woman even if they are not from her tribe; but the blood-money of the criminal act of the mawla is only against her tribe.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34850 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Abu Salama Ibn Abdulrahman Ibn Awuf from Abu Huraira that a woman from the Hudhayl tribe threw a stone at a woman from the same tribe; and she had a miscarriage. The Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; gave a judgement that a slave or slave-girl of fair complexion and excellence should be given to her.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34851 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Said Ibn AlMusayab that the Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; gave a judgement that the compensation for a foetus killed in its mother womb was a slave or slave-girl of fair complexion and excellence. The one against whom the judgement was given said; Why should I pay damages for that which did not drink or eat or speak or make any cry. The like of that is nothing. The Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; said; This is only one of the brothers of the diviners. He disapproved of the rhyming speech of the man declaration.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34852 +Yahya related to me from Malik that Rabia Ibn Abi Abdulrahman said; The slave of fair complexion and excellence is estimated at fifty dinars or six hundred dirhams. The blood-money of a free muslim woman is five hundred dinars or six thousand dirhams. Malik said; The blood-money of the foetus of a free woman is a tenth of her blood-money. The tenth is fifty dinars or six hundred dirhams. Malik said; I have not heard anyone dispute that there is no slave in compensation for the foetus until it leaves its mother womb and falls still-born from her womb. Malik said; I heard that if the foetus comes out of its mother womb alive and then dies; the full blood-money is due for it. Malik said; The foetus is not alive unless it cries at birth. If it comes out of its mother womb and cries out and then dies; the complete blood-money is due for it. We think that the slave- girl foetus has a tenth of the price of the slave-girl. Malik said; When a woman murders a man or woman; and the murderess is pregnant; retaliation is not taken against her until she has given birth. If a woman who is pregnant is killed intentionally or unintentionally; the one who killed her is not obliged to pay anything for her foetus. If she is murdered; then the one who killed her is killed and there is no blood-money for her foetus. If she is killed accidentally; the tribe obliged to pay on behalf of her killer pays her blood-money; and there is no blood-money for the foetus. Yahya related to me; Malik was asked about the foetus of the christian or jewish woman which was aborted. He said; I think that there is a tenth of the blood-money of the mother for it.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34853 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab that Said Ibn AlMusayab used to say; The full blood-money is payable for cutting off both lips; but when the lower one only is cut off; two-thirds of the blood-money is due for it.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34854 +Yahya related to me from Malik that he asked Ibn Shihab about the one-eyed man who gouged out the eye of a healthy person. Ibn Shihab said; If the healthy person wants to take retaliation from him; he can have his retaliation. If he prefers; he has blood-money of one thousand dinars; twelve thousand dirhams. Yahya related to me from Malik that he heard that full blood- money was payable for both of a pair of anything in a man that occurred in pairs; and the tongue had full blood-money. The ears; when their hearing departed; had full blood-money; whether or not they were cut off; and a man penis had full blood-money and the testicles had full blood-money. Yahya related to me from Malik that he heard that the breasts of a woman had full blood-money. Malik said; The least of that are the eyebrows and a man breasts. Malik said; What is done in our community when a man is injured in his extremities to an extent that obliges payment of more than the amount of his full blood-money; is that it is his right. If his hands; feet; and eyes are all injured; he has three full blood-moneys. Malik said about the sound eye of a one-eyed man when it is accidentally gouged out; The full blood-money is payable for it.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34855 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya Ibn Said from Sulayman Ibn Yasar that Zayd Ibn Thabit used to say; When the eye remains but the sight is lost; one hundred dinars are payable for it. Yahya said; Malik was asked about cutting off the lower lid of the eye and the bone around the eye. He said; There is only ijtihad in that unless the vision of the eye is impaired. He is entitled to an amount that is compatible to the extent the vision of the eye has been impaired. Yahya said that Malik said; What is done in our community about removing the bad eye of a one-eyed man when it has already been blinded and still remains there in its place and the paralyzed hand when it is cut off; is that there is only ijtihad in that; and there is no prescribed blood-money.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34856 +Yahya related to me from Malik that Yahya Ibn Said heard Sulayman Ibn Yasar mention that a face wound in which the bone was bared was like a head wound in which the bone was bared; unless the face was scarred by the wound. Then the blood-money is increased by one half of the blood-money of the head wound in which the skin was bared so that seventy five dinars are payable for it. Malik said; What is done in our community is that the head wound with splinters has fifteen camels. He explained; The head wound with splinters is that from which pieces of bone fly off and which does not reach the brain. It can be in the head or the face. Malik said; The generally agreed on way of doing things in our community; is that there is no retaliation for a wound to the brain or a belly wound; and Ibn Shihab has said; There is no retaliation for a wound to the brain. Malik explained; The wound to the brain is what pierces the bones to the brain. This type of wound only occurs in the head. It is that which reaches the brain when the bones are pierced. Malik said; What is done in our community is that there is no blood-money paid on any head wound less than one which lays bare the skull. Blood-money is payable only for the head wound that bares the bone and what is worse than that. That is because the Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; stopped at the head wound which bared the bone in his letter to Amr Ibn Hazm. He made it five camels. The imams; past and present; have not made any blood- money payable for injuries less than the head wound which bares the bone.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34857 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya Ibn Said; that Said Ibn AlMusayab said; For every piercing wound in any of the organs or limbs of the body; one third of the blood-money of that limb is payable.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34858 +Malik related to me; Ibn Shihab did not think and nor do I; that there is a generally agreed on way of doing things regarding a piercing wound in any of the organs or limbs of the body; but I think that there is ijtihad in the case. The imam uses ijtihad in it; and there is no generally agreed on way of doing things in our community about it. Malik said; What is done in our community about the wound to the brain and the wound which splinters the bone; and the wound that bares the bone is that they apply only to the head and face. Whatever of that occurs in the body only has ijtihad in it. Malik said; I do not think the lower jaw and the nose are part of the head in their injury because they are separate bones; and except for them the head is one bone.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34859 +Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia Ibn Abi Abdulrahman that Abdullah Ibn AlZubair allowed retaliation for a head wound which splintered the bone.  +
MuwataMalik-017-001-34860 +Ibn Abi Abdulrahman said; I asked Said Ibn AlMusayab; How much for the finger of a woman? He said; Ten camels I said; How much for two fingers? He said; Twenty camels. I said; How much for three? He said; Thirty camels. I said; How much for four? He said; Twenty camels. I said; When her wound is greater and her affliction stronger; is her blood-money then less? He said; Are you an Iraqi? I said; Rather; I am a scholar who seeks to verify things; or an ignorant man who seeks to learn. Said said; It is the sunna; my nephew. Malik said; What is done in our community about all the fingers of the hand being cut off is that its blood- money is complete. That is because when five fingers are cut; their blood-money is the blood-money of the hand: fifty camels. Each finger has ten camels. Malik said; The reckoning of the fingers is thirty-three dinars for each fingertip; and that is three and a third shares of camels.  +