Ila
From HodHood
Revision as of 13:10, 9 October 2018 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Imported from text file)
Ila Completed Form
The word Ila is a stemmed form of the following words:
Ila Dictionary Definition
Please Note, links to other source may not be legitimate or accurate.
from dictionary.com
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/Ila
from collinsdictionary.com
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/Ila
Ila in Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ila
Ila References or Citations
In Quran
nothing found
In Hadith Text Books
Ila In Sahih AlBukhari
Hadith Page | Arabic Text | English Translation | Book and Chapter |
---|---|---|---|
SahihAlBukhari-017-001-3157 | Narrated Nafi: Ibn Umar used to say about the Ila which Allah defined in the Holy Book ; If the period of Ila expires; then the husband has either to retain his wife in a handsome manner or to divorce her as Allah has ordered. | The Chapter on Wives And Relationship Sexual Intercourse in HodHood Indexing, Chapter on Those who take an oath not to have sexual relations with their wives must wait four months in Sahih AlBukhari |
In Sahih Muslim
Hadith Page | Arabic Text | English Translation | Book and Chapter |
---|---|---|---|
SahihMuslim-017-001-18099 | The same tradition has been narrated through a different chain of transmitters on the authority of Amash. This version contains the words: Ila amrin yofziuna instead of Ila amrin narifuhu. | The Chapter on Supplication And Torment Related To Life And Death in HodHood Indexing, Chapter on 34 in Sahih Muslim |
In Sunan AlTermithi
nothing found
In Sunan AlNasai
nothing found
In Sunan Abu Dawoud
nothing found
In Muwata Malik
Hadith Page | Arabic Text | English Translation | Book and Chapter |
---|---|---|---|
MuwataMalik-017-001-35205 | Yahya related to me from Malik that he had heard that Marwan Ibn AlHakam decided about a man who had made a vow to abstain from intercourse with his wife; that when four months had passed; it was a divorce and he could return to her as long as she was in her idda. Malik added; That was also the opinion of Ibn Shihab. Malik said that if a man made a vow to abstain from intercourse with his wife and at the end of four months he declared his intent to continue to abstain; he was divorced. He could go back to his wife; but if he did not have intercourse with her before the end of her idda; he had no access to her and he could not go back to her unless he had an excuse - illness; imprisonment; or a similar excuse. His return to her maintained her as his wife. If her idda passed and then he married her after that and did not have intercourse with her until four months had passed and he declared his intent to continue to abstain; divorce was applied to him by the first vow. If four months passed; and he had not returned to her; he had no idda against her nor access because he had married her and then divorced her before touching her. Malik said that a man who made a vow to abstain from intercourse with his wife and continued to abstain after four months and so divorced her; but then returned and did not touch her and four months were completed before her idda was completed; did not have to declare his intent and divorce did not befall him. If he had intercourse with her before the end of her idda; he was entitled to her. If her idda passed before he had intercourse with her; he had no access to her. This is what Malik preferred of what he had heard on the subject. Malik said that if a man made a vow to abstain from intercourse with his wife and then divorced her; and the four months of the vow were completed before completion of the idda of the divorce; it counted as two pronouncements of divorce. If he declared his intention to continue to abstain and the idda of the divorce finished before the four months the vow of abstention was not a divorce. That was because the four months had passed and she was not his on that day. Malik said; If someone makes a vow not to have intercourse with his wife for a day or a month and then waits until more than four months have passed; it is not ila. Ila only applies to someone who vows more than four months. As for the one who vows not to have intercourse with his wife for four months or less than that; I do not think that it is ila because when the term enters into it at which it stops; he comes out of his oath and he does not have to declare his intention. Malik said; If someone vows to his wife not to have intercourse with her until her child has been weaned; that is not ila. I have heard that Ali Ibn Abi Talib was asked about that and he did not think that it was ila. | The Chapter on Wives And Relationship Sexual Intercourse in HodHood Indexing, The Book of Marriage in Muwata Malik | |
MuwataMalik-017-001-35206 | Yahya related to me from Malik that he had asked Ibn Shihab about the ila of the slave. He said that it was like the ila of the free man; and it put an obligation on him. The ila of the slave was two months. | The Chapter on Slaves And Praise And Worship in HodHood Indexing, The Book of Marriage in Muwata Malik | |
MuwataMalik-017-001-35211 | ahya related to me from Malik that he asked Ibn Shihab about the dhihar of a slave. He said; It is like the dhihar of a free man. Malik said; He meant that the same conditions were applied in both cases. Malik said; The dhihar of the slave is incumbent on him; and the fasting of the slave in the dhihar is two months. Malik said that there was no ila for a slave who pronounced a dhihar from his wife. That was because if he were to fast the kaffara for pronouncing a dhihar; the divorce of the ila would come to him before he had finished the fast. | The Chapter on Wives And Relationship Pronouncing Dhiar in HodHood Indexing, The Book of Marriage in Muwata Malik |
Template:Word Definition Word Association Template
Template:Word Definition Word Rules Template