Liabl

From HodHood
Revision as of 13:21, 9 October 2018 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Imported from text file)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Liabl Completed Form

The word Liabl is a stemmed form of the following words:


Liabl Dictionary Definition

Please Note, links to other source may not be legitimate or accurate.

from dictionary.com

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/Liabl

from collinsdictionary.com

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/Liabl

Liabl in Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liabl

Liabl References or Citations

In Quran

nothing found

In Hadith Text Books

Liabl In Sahih AlBukhari

nothing found

In Sahih Muslim

nothing found

In Sunan AlTermithi

Hadith PageArabic TextEnglish TranslationBook and Chapter
SunanAlTermithi-017-001-7755The Chapter on Contracts And Disputes In Selling in HodHood Indexing, Chapter on What Has Been Related About The Borrowed Is To Be Returned in Sunan AlTermithi

In Sunan AlNasai

nothing found


In Sunan Abu Dawoud

nothing found

In Muwata Malik

Hadith PageArabic TextEnglish TranslationBook and Chapter
MuwataMalik-017-001-34872Malik said that Ibn Shihab said; The precedent of the sunna in the intentional murder is that when the relatives of the murdered person relinquish retaliation; the blood-money is owed by the murderer from his own property unless the tribe helps him with it willingly. Malik said; What is done in our community is that the blood- money is not obliged against the tribe until it has reached a third of the full amount and upwards. Whatever reaches a third is against the tribe; and whatever is below a third; is against the property of the one who did the injury. Malik said; The way of doing things about which there is no dispute among us; in the case of someone who has the blood-money accepted from him in intentional murder or in any injury in which there is retaliation; is that that blood-money is not due from the tribe unless they wish it. The blood-money for that is from the property of the murderer or the injurer if he has property. If he does not have any property; it is a debt against him; and none of it is owed by the tribe unless they wish. Malik said; The tribe does not pay blood-money to anyone who injures himself; intentionally or accidentally. This is the opinion of the people of fiqh in our community. I have not heard that anyone has made the tribe liable for any blood-money incurred by intentional acts. Part of what is well-known of that is that Allah; the Blessed; and the Exalted; said in His Book; Whoever has something pardoned him by his brother; should follow it with what is accepted and pay it with good will Surat 2 ayat 178 The commentary on that - in our view - and Allah knows best; is that whoever gives his brother something of the blood- money; should follow it with what is accepted and pay him with good will. Malik spoke about a child who had no property and a woman who had no property. He said; When one of them causes an injury below a third of the blood-money; it is taken on behalf of the child and woman from their personal property; if they have property from which it may be taken. If not; the injury which each of them has caused is a debt against them. The tribe does not have to pay any of it and the father of a child is not liable for the blood-money of an injury caused by the child and he is not responsible for it. Malik said; The way of doing things in our community about which there is no dispute; is that when a slave is killed; the value for him is that of the day on which he was killed. The tribe of the murderer is not liable for any of the value of the slave; great or small. That is the responsibility of the one who struck him from his own personal property as far as it covers. If the value of the slave is the blood- money or more; that is against him in his property. That is because the slave is a certain type of goods.The Chapter on Injury In Crimes And Felonies in HodHood Indexing, The Book of General Subjects in Muwata Malik
MuwataMalik-017-001-34919Yahya said that he heard Malik say; What is done in our community about a man who rents an animal for a journey to a specified place and then he goes beyond that place and further; is that the owner of the animal has a choice. If he wants to take extra rent for his animal to cover the distance overstepped; he is given that on top of the first rent and the animal is returned. If the owner of the animal likes to sell the animal from the place where he over-steps; he has the price of the animal on top of the rent. If; however; the hirer rented the animal to go and return and then he overstepped when he reached the city to which he rented him; the owner of the animal only has half the first rent. That is because half of the rent is going; and half of it is returning. If he oversteps with the animal; only half of the first rent is obliged for him. Had the animal died when he reached the city to which it was rented; the hirer would not be liable and the renter would only have half the rent. Malik said; That is what is done with people who overstep and dispute about what they took the animal for. Malik said; It is also like that with some one who takes qirad-money from his companion. The owner of the property says to him; Do not buy such-and-such animals or such- and-such goods. He names them and forbids them and disapproves of his money being invested in them. The one who takes the money then buys what he was forbidden. By that; he intends to be liable for the money and take the profit of his companion. When he does that; the owner of the money has an option. If he wants to enter with him in the goods according to the original stipulations between them about the profit; he does so. If he likes; he has his capital guaranteed against the one who took the capital and over stepped the mark. Malik said; It is also like that with a man with whom another man invests some goods. The owner of the property orders him to buy certain goods for him which he names. He differs; and buys with the goods something other than what he was ordered to buy. He exceeded his orders. The owner of the goods has an option. If he wants to take what was bought with his property; he takes it. If he wants the partner to be liable for his capital he has that.The Chapter on Forbidden Financial Transaction in HodHood Indexing, The Book of The Evil Eye in Muwata Malik

Template:Word Definition Word Association Template

Template:Word Definition Word Rules Template


Template:Word Definition Category Template