Testat

Testat Completed Form

The word Testat is a stemmed form of the following words:

Testat Dictionary Definition

Please Note, links to other source may not be legitimate or accurate.

from dictionary.com

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/Testat

from collinsdictionary.com

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/Testat

Testat in Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testat

Testat References or Citations

In Quran

Quran Surat	Sura and Ayah	Polarity	Sura Classification	Sura Sequence	Related Subjects	Ayah Text	English Translation
Surat AlBaqara Ayah 182	Surat AlBaqara	0.38		87	Forgiving merci, Wrong forgiv, Make peac, Partial wrong, Parti concerned, Wrong testator, Concerned wrong, Testator make, Wrong forgiving, Wrong forg, Fear partial, Peac parti	فَمَنْ خَافَ مِنْ مُوصٍ جَنَفًا أَوْ إِثْمًا فَأَصْلَحَ بَيْنَهُمْ فَلَا إِثْمَ عَلَيْهِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ	But if anyone fears partiality or wrong-doing on the part of the testator, and makes peace between (The parties concerned), there is no wrong in him: For Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

In Hadith Text Books

Testat In Sahih AlBukhari

nothing found

In Sahih Muslim

nothing found

In Sunan AlTermithi

nothing found

In Sunan AlNasai

nothing found

In Sunan Abu Dawoud

nothing found

In Muwata Malik

Hadith Page	Arabic Text	English Translation	Book and Chapter
MuwataMalik-017-001-34813		Malik said; The generally agreed-on way of doing things among us in the case of slave whose master makes a bequest to free part of him - a third; a fourth; a half; or any share after his death; is that only the portion of him is freed that his master has named. This is because the freeing of that portion is only obliged to take place after the death of the master because the master has the option to withdraw the bequest as long as he lives. When the slave is freed from his master; the master is a testator and the testator only has access to free what he can take from his property; being the third of the property he is allowed to bequeath; and the rest of the slave is not free because the man property has gone out of his hands. How can the rest of the slave which belongs to other people be free when they did not initiate the setting free and did not confirm it and they do not have the wala established for them? Only the deceased could do that. He was the one who freed him and the one for whom the wala was confirmed. That is not to be borne by another property unless he bequeaths within the third of his property what remains of a lave to be freed. That is a request against his partners and inheritors and the partners must not refuse the slave that when it is within the third of the dead man property because there is no harm in that to the inheritors. Malik said; If a man frees a third of his slave while he is critically ill; he must complete the emancipation so all of him is free from him; if it is within the third of his property that he has access to; because he is not treated in the same way as a man who frees a third of a slave after his death; because had the one who freed a third of his slave after his death lived; he could have cancelled it and the slave being set free would be of no effect. The master who made the freeing of the third of the slave irrevocable in his illness; would still have to free all of him if he lived. If he died; the slave would be set free within the third of the bequest. That is because the command of the deceased is permissible in his third as the command of the healthy is permissible in all his property.	The Chapter on Slave As A Property in HodHood Indexing, The Book of Speech in Muwata Malik
MuwataMalik-017-001-34885		Malik related to me from Nafi from Abdullah Ibn Umar that the Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; said; It is the duty of a muslim man who has something to be given as a bequest not to spend two nights without writing a will about it. Malik said; The generally agreed-on way of doing things in our community is that when the testator writes something in health or illness as a bequest; and it has freeing slaves or things other than that in it; he can alter it in any way he chooses; until he is on his deathbed. If he prefers to abandon a bequest or change it; he can do so unless he has made a slave mudabbar to be freed after his death. If he has made him mudabbar; there is no way to change what he has made mudabbar. He is allowed to change his testament because the Messenger of Allah; may Allah bless him and grant him peace; said; It is the duty of a muslim man who has something to be given as a bequest not to spend two nights without writing a will about it. Malik explained; Had the testator not been able to change his will nor what was mentioned in it about freeing slaves; each testator might withhold making bequests from his property; whether in freeing slaves or other than it. A man gives a bequest in his health and in his travelling. i.e. he does not wait till his death bed. Malik summed up; The way of doing things in our community about which there is no dispute is that he can change whatever he likes of that except for the mudabbar.	The Chapter on Selling Of Slaves in HodHood Indexing, The Book of Hair in Muwata Malik